"first name: agent, last name: washington" (
implanted
) wrote
2014
-
12
-
04
02:14 pm
Entry tags:
!inbox
🚀 INBOX.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Day 79, misfire fun for everyone!
imperialshadow
2015-01-02 05:19 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
TO:
elric.edward@cdc.org
Edward if you do not respond I will hurt you, this is not funny.
I'M SO GLAD
implanted
2015-01-02 05:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
Are you trying to guess my name or something?
8'D
imperialshadow
2015-01-02 05:26 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
What? I did not send you anything.
no subject
implanted
2015-01-02 05:29 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
You called me Edward. Maybe you sent it to the wrong person.
no subject
imperialshadow
2015-01-02 05:34 am (UTC)
(
link
)
[AFTER FRANTICALLY TRYING TO FIND HER SENT BOX...]
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
No, I am sure I sent it to him! How did you receive it?
no subject
implanted
2015-01-02 05:38 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
The same way I get everything else. Hold on.
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
It's addressed to an Elric, Edward.
no subject
imperialshadow
2015-01-02 05:42 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
Yes, that is who I meant to send it to.
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
But that does not explain why you received it.
no subject
implanted
2015-01-02 10:36 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
My best guess would be signal interference.
no subject
imperialshadow
2015-01-02 11:25 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
As with a radio? What could cause the interference?
no subject
implanted
2015-01-03 09:24 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
Other radio frequencies, or a disruption in the source. Probably a lot of other things.
no subject
imperialshadow
2015-01-03 09:07 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
Perhaps it is a lingering effect of whatever forced the mails to shut down in the first place.
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
I suppose it is useless for me to speculate on these things. I am not much help with the technology here.
no subject
implanted
2015-01-04 12:45 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
Probably. It's good to be wary until it's fixed.
no subject
imperialshadow
2015-01-04 05:37 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
lanfan@cdc.org
I will. I am sorry to have bothered you.
no subject
implanted
2015-01-06 08:28 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
washington@cdc.org
It's fine.
115 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
Day 79, misfire fun for everyone!
TO: elric.edward@cdc.org
Edward if you do not respond I will hurt you, this is not funny.
I'M SO GLAD
Are you trying to guess my name or something?
8'D
What? I did not send you anything.
no subject
You called me Edward. Maybe you sent it to the wrong person.
no subject
FROM: lanfan@cdc.org
No, I am sure I sent it to him! How did you receive it?
no subject
The same way I get everything else. Hold on.
FROM: washington@cdc.org
It's addressed to an Elric, Edward.
no subject
Yes, that is who I meant to send it to.
FROM: lanfan@cdc.org
But that does not explain why you received it.
no subject
My best guess would be signal interference.
no subject
As with a radio? What could cause the interference?
no subject
Other radio frequencies, or a disruption in the source. Probably a lot of other things.
no subject
Perhaps it is a lingering effect of whatever forced the mails to shut down in the first place.
FROM: lanfan@cdc.org
I suppose it is useless for me to speculate on these things. I am not much help with the technology here.
no subject
Probably. It's good to be wary until it's fixed.
no subject
I will. I am sorry to have bothered you.
no subject
It's fine.